Home » Forum

CLOSED: Systems- ECFS: What are ways that the Electronic Comment Filing System could be improved?


The reboot.fcc.gov project has ended. All related public feedback forums have been closed.*

My idea is...

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  1. Allow people to redact personal information from public internet

    Comments from the Electronic Comment Filing System have personal information that may lead to identity theft. There should be a way to redact personal information from public view.

    9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    • Encourage electronic filing and allow search of text

      Electronic filing is now optional. Indeed, this leads to an abuse of process trick where filers can delay public availability for tactical advantage.

      There should be incentives for electronic filing of documents that are computer readable , e.g. electronically converted .pdf documents that are not password protected.
      Such documents facilitate the work of the FCC staff because your can search and copy information for comment summaries. The same applies to outside parties who benefit from computer readable documents.

      Incentives might include allowing a slightly later filing date for electronically filed computer readable comments. (I note that the French version of…

      4 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      Check!
      (thinking…)
      Reset
      or sign in with
      • facebook
      • google
        Password icon
        I agree to the terms of service
        Signed in as (Sign out)
        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
        0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
      • Disclosure of conflicts of interests

        Require filers to disclose conflicts of interest and/or employers when commenting on an issue.

        3 votes
        Vote
        Sign in
        Check!
        (thinking…)
        Reset
        or sign in with
        • facebook
        • google
          Password icon
          I agree to the terms of service
          Signed in as (Sign out)
          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
          0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
        • Identifying Documents Filed in Multiple Dockets

          ECFS 2.0 added the great improvement of being able to submit a document to multiple proceedings in one step - a boon to all filers. However, on the other side, it would be hugely useful to those of us who monitor proceedings for ECFS to identify what other dockets a particular document was filed in. This would allow the public to comprehensively review multiple dockets while reducing the amount of repeated downloading.

          It seems the ideal way to do this would be to simply having a single id for each filed document, thus having a single url (http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=XXX)…

          3 votes
          Vote
          Sign in
          Check!
          (thinking…)
          Reset
          or sign in with
          • facebook
          • google
            Password icon
            I agree to the terms of service
            Signed in as (Sign out)
            You have left! (?) (thinking…)
            0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
          • For ex parte filings, require the entry of the meeting date

            At present there is no simple way for the Commission staff or outsiders to see if an ex parte filing was timely since the date of the meeting is in the text only. For filings subject to 1.1206(b)(2) the ECFS entry form should require the filer to state the date of the oral ex parte contact and automatically flag late ones for both the staff and the public.

            If there is an explanation, let the filer state so in the filing.

            2 votes
            Vote
            Sign in
            Check!
            (thinking…)
            Reset
            or sign in with
            • facebook
            • google
              Password icon
              I agree to the terms of service
              Signed in as (Sign out)
              You have left! (?) (thinking…)
              0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
            • Facilitate downloads of multiple comments

              FCC staff has access to an internal system to download and print multiple comments at the same time. But the website systems is focused on each filing.

              Allow users to select multiple filings with checkmarks or date limits and load them all in one transaction, rather than downloading one by one.

              1 vote
              Vote
              Sign in
              Check!
              (thinking…)
              Reset
              or sign in with
              • facebook
              • google
                Password icon
                I agree to the terms of service
                Signed in as (Sign out)
                You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

              CLOSED: Systems- ECFS: What are ways that the Electronic Comment Filing System could be improved?

              Feedback and Knowledge Base