CLOSED: Data: How can the data released on FCC.gov/data be better formatted so as to be more useful to the public?

The reboot.fcc.gov project has ended. All related public feedback forums have been closed.*

My idea is...

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".

- enter your suggestions and ideas here.

(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

Except amateur, licenses in Wireless Tele. Bureau are assigned a single callsign for all services.

Improve efficiency and attribution of data...

3 votes

Vote

We're glad you're here
Please sign in to leave feedback

Signed in as (Sign out)

Close

Close

You have left! (?) (thinking…)

0 comments · Delete… · Admin →
Allow electronic filing of ALL tyrpes of filings and disclose them promptly

While ECFS allows many filings to be sent electronically, it amazes me that even after the anthrax problem of several years ago some filings MUST be on paper. Examples include petitions for rulemaking and petitions for review of nondocketed items.

Also I am now involved in a restricted proceeding dealing with a petition for review of staff rejection of a complaint. There is nothing on the current FCC website that even hints that this action has been ongoing for over a year, let alone gives public access to the filings made by both sides. Indeed, if other parties were aware of it, they might wish to file comments. This is not transparency - it is more like a "star chamber".

While ECFS allows many filings to be sent electronically, it amazes me that even after the anthrax problem of several years ago some filings MUST be on paper. Examples include petitions for rulemaking and petitions for review of nondocketed items.

Also I am now involved in a restricted proceeding dealing with a petition for review of staff rejection of a complaint. There is nothing on the current FCC website that even hints that this action has been ongoing for over a year, let alone gives public access to the filings made by both sides. Indeed, if other parties were aware…

24 votes

Vote

We're glad you're here
Please sign in to leave feedback

Signed in as (Sign out)

Close

Close

You have left! (?) (thinking…)

1 comment · Delete… · Admin →

← Previous 1 2 Next →

CLOSED: Data: How can the data released on FCC.gov/data be better formatted so as to be more useful to the public?

My idea is...

There are two ways to get more votes:

Except amateur, licenses in Wireless Tele. Bureau are assigned a single callsign for all services.

Allow electronic filing of ALL tyrpes of filings and disclose them promptly

Feedback