I see the CB and Ten meter radio regulations as outdated and overly constrictive for todays radio enthusiasts. I think they should be reevaluated and updated for todays activists. I also think that the licensing restrictions should be lessened for the modern day users.

Is the FCC aware that GXS corp is denying interconnections to certain competitive EDI message systems, and these are monopolies after mergers - and are creating electronic transaction systems that denying routing access to innovators? How does a disadvantaged EDI Network attain standing at the FCC to redress this issue?

By creating such rules, you can police those mongers that hoovers across these social media networks.

Julius Genachowski, may as well hire an anti-hacking team because he will not be safe. I'm no hacker but as frequent internet user I know he will be screwed.

Keep the internet free and open.. stop the FCC from continually co-signing the monopolization of american media.

Fox station and shows like glenn beck and hln should have to post a warning prior to their airing that they are mainly for entertainment purposes. there should be a code of ethics actual news stations try to abide by there by creating less toxicity.

Keep racist, ignorant people like Clyburn out of the FCC. How did you even get this job?

I think these companies are a complete rip-off. I sign a 2 year agreement, so That 5.00 leased receiver fee should be off my account. I technically own it. So my question FCC is when do I stop paying for a "leased" receiver. I mean It's been 7 years already.

Pnones telegraph lines cable dsl are new evolving innovations that parralel economic stability. When these are sabotaged freedom is also. Reckless abandon of the privilege of devices runs parralel with law abiding individuals. Freedom is choice yet we still need Police don't we. However, is dial up the basic standard? It was until cable, then dsl, then phones took over this factor. Access is the key component here. Best Business Practices is key to consumer satisfaction. Fraud is no stranger to cyber accessibility. It just is. A standard is possible if we can discuss this rationally.

Why isn't it illegal for someone to use the telephone for fraud? You hear about these scammers all the time who are trying to bilk someone out of money, whether it's through the internet, the phone or a mobile device. Doing this should be illegal, plain and simple. Having access to communication is a priviledge, not a right for scum who would take advantage of another human being.

In a simple format I would like to see what rules have been added, and subtracted from the FCC in the past 5 to 10 years.

Comcast has hx of slowing speeds w/o any notice/chg spyware w/o any notice/ no rational communciation w/consmrs/ not giving appropriate bandwidth/redlining etc